Patna High Court
For assessee
Case-law directory
Every ruling, in plain sight.
Search and filter tax rulings from the Supreme Court, the High Courts, the GST Appellate Tribunal and the advance-ruling authorities.
Case-law directory
Search and filter tax rulings from the Supreme Court, the High Courts, the GST Appellate Tribunal and the advance-ruling authorities.
20 rulings found
Patna High Court
Where petitioner was arrested for allegedly orchestrating issuance and availment of fraudulent ITC through fake tax invoices, considering that charge sheet had been filed and investigation stood completed, petitioner was enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond and two sureties of like amount to satisfaction of ACJM
Punjab & Haryana High Court
Where petitioners managing payout company and linked firm were accused in GST evasion network misreporting online money-gaming receipts through sham entities and dummy directors, with investigation completed, four months' custody, documentary evidence, and no risk of influence or tampering, further detention would have served no useful purpose and regular bail was to be granted subject to conditions
Punjab & Haryana High Court
Where petitioner was accused of availing wrongful ITC using fake invoices without goods movement, remained in custody for about four months, had clean antecedents, case material was documentary, there was no risk of flight or tampering with evidence, and trial was not nearing completion, continued detention was unwarranted and petitioner was entitled to bail subject to conditions
Karnataka High Court
Where petitioners running a firm for battery recycling faced allegations of fictitious suppliers, bogus ITC and supplier untraceability, since petitioners held valid GST registration, cancellation or closure of suppliers post-supply did not per se disentitle ITC absent proof of collusion, had cooperated and had no antecedents, custodial interrogation for compoundable offences with maximum five-year term was unwarranted; Anticipatory bail was to be granted subject to conditions
Allahabad High Court
Where GST demand and penalty proceedings for alleged fake ITC based on MIS Portal and e-way bill analysis were initiated and prosecution regime was available under GST law, parallel prosecution and cognizance under BNS for same facts could not continue, so charge sheet and cognizance order in BNS proceedings were quashed in view of primacy of special statute
Allahabad High Court
Where authorities alleged firm availed and passed on fake ITC through bogus invoices and initiated simultaneous GST demand and BNS prosecution based on same facts, since genesis was GST non-payment and BNSS mandates such offences be investigated under special enactments, prosecution under BNS for same conduct was barred and all parallel criminal proceedings under general law were quashed against applicant
Allahabad High Court
Where applicant accused of availing fraudulent input tax credit on invoices of non-existent firms was in custody after investigation completion, no evidence showed likelihood of tampering, intimidation or evasion, assessment was not initiated, maximum punishment was five years, and trial was unlikely soon, bail was justified considering presumption of innocence, speedy trial, and bail as rule
Karnataka High Court
Where petitioners, scrap-trading firm proprietors, purchased goods from validly registered suppliers with payment through banking channels, held invoices, filed GST returns, and faced allegations of bogus invoices due to subsequent supplier cancellation, ITC could not be denied without proof of fraud or collusion, and anticipatory bail was justified as custodial interrogation was unwarranted given cooperation and no prior antecedents
Allahabad High Court
Where applicant was accused of operating multiple shell firms to pass fraudulent ITC with large financial magnitude and was in custody with no prior criminal antecedents, with no assessment proceedings pending and maximum sentence of five years, bail was granted citing fair procedure, presumption of innocence, and protracted trial likelihood
Punjab & Haryana High Court
Where complaint alleged wrongful availment of ITC M/s NIPL but did not arraign company as accused despite offences being attributed to company as registered person, prosecution of Director alone was not maintainable as company must first be arraigned for vicarious liability to arise, leading to quashing of complaint and all consequential proceedings
Punjab & Haryana High Court
Where petitioners accused of creating 26 fake firms and issuing bogus invoices causing fraudulent ITC benefit and substantial loss to revenue were in custody over seven months, with prosecution primarily based on documentary and electronic evidence and no risk of tampering or flight, coupled with no criminal antecedents, further incarceration was held unwarranted and regular bail was granted subject to conditions
Allahabad High Court
Where applicant, proprietor of areca nut trading firm, was prosecuted for alleged issuance of bogus retail invoices for B2B supplies and routing of cash via brokers, with no prior criminal history, undisclosed evasion amount, assessment pending, completed investigation, and no evidence of risk to justice, bail was justified as pre-conviction detention was not punitive and bail was rule
Telangana High Court
Where designated partners of LLP were accused of availing fraudulent ITC with alleged fake suppliers and department sought arrest for custodial interrogation despite all documents being in custody of authority and no real risk of abscondence or tampering of evidences, since petitioner was cooperating, arrest was not warranted at this stage and anticipatory bail was to be granted subject to stringent conditions
Rajasthan High Court
Where petitioner, a partner in firm alleged to have evaded GST by supplying goods without invoices worth Rs 53.16 crores, faced offences triable by Magistrate with maximum five-year punishment since investigation stood completed and custodial interrogation or recovery was no longer needed, bail was granted as trial would take time
Karnataka High Court
Where petitioners involved in alleged large-scale GST evasion sought anticipatory bail to approach judicial forum in another state, limited interim protection was to be granted for ten days subject to personal bond and sureties, passport surrender, and cooperation with investigation as there was no flight risk
Gauhati High Court
Where director of civil construction company was arrested for alleged wrongful ITC based on fabricated invoices for NHIDCL project, all incriminating documents were already seized and petitioner remained over 15 days in custody for an offence punishable up to five years, further detention would not serve purpose and bail was granted considering adverse business impact
Chhattisgarh High Court
Where based on certain statements, financial transactions and operational links, applicant was alleged to have orchestrated creation and operation of firm for fraudulent input tax credit using bogus suppliers and invoices, since there was no unimpeachable document establishing him as proprietor while significant investigation had already been completed, regular bail was to be granted as extended custody and custodial interrogation were not required
Allahabad High Court
Where a person was arrested for alleged GST offences in one State and was produced before a remand Magistrate in another State without securing a transit remand from a Magistrate at place of arrest, such production and detention were impermissible, rendering arrest and remand vitiated and detention illegal, warranting release of detenue on habeas corpus. GST: Where petitioner was arrested for alleged GST offences and arrest memo failed to disclose place of arrest and did not furnish written grounds of arrest as annexure despite departmental circular mandating such procedure, such non-compliance with mandatory arrest safeguards rendered remand order and consequent detention illegal
Delhi High Court
Where company issued high value E-way bills without filing GST returns, was non-existent at registered address, failed to respond to summons but only sent replies, and investigation suggested ineligible ITC and circular trading, seven days prior notice before arrest was justified as natural justice and not a blanket restraint, upholding department's right to investigate and proceed in law
Punjab & Haryana High Court
Where proprietor of GST-registered iron and steel trading concern was arrested for wrongful ITC claims relying on documentary evidence, with judicial custody exceeding three-and-a-half months, further detention was unwarranted as investigation was based on documents, no flight risk or potential for evidence tampering existed and speedy trial rights demanded grant of bail subject to conditions