GSTAT Ghaziabad
For assessee
Case-law directory
Every ruling, in plain sight.
Search and filter tax rulings from the Supreme Court, the High Courts, the GST Appellate Tribunal and the advance-ruling authorities.
Case-law directory
Search and filter tax rulings from the Supreme Court, the High Courts, the GST Appellate Tribunal and the advance-ruling authorities.
4 rulings found
GSTAT Ghaziabad
Where appellant providing fire-safety works contract services had GST registration cancelled, resulting in complete business paralysis and loss of livelihood, and sought exemption from ordinary Registry scrutiny for urgent Tribunal hearing, procedural rules preserving inherent power and intended to advance justice warranted urgent listing upon showing sufficient cause, without exempting any mandatory statutory requirements or affecting merit of appeal
GSTAT Hyderabad
Where departmental appeal challenged condonation of delay by First Appellate Authority and respondent sought abeyance or listing before Special Bench based on parallel taxpayer appeals, request was rejected since instant appeal was by department, not falling under category designated for Special Bench, and abeyance plea was not allowed, though additional submissions were permitted
GSTAT Hyderabad
Where appellant failed to cure registry defects regarding SCN uploading, court fee, respondent details, and did not appear for multiple scheduled hearings despite repeated opportunities, persistent non-compliance showed lack of interest in prosecuting appeal, justifying dismissal for want of prosecution under Rule 42, supported by inherent powers to secure justice and prevent abuse, without examination of merits
GSTAT Kolkata
Where applicants filed interlocutory applications for early hearing of 21 appeals before GSTAT citing substantial financial prejudice caused by denial of refund and pendency, with all procedural prerequisites fulfilled and respondents raising no objection to early listing, applicants established a compelling case for priority hearing and their applications for early hearing were to be accordingly allowed