Supreme Court
Topic
Refund claims, limitation, zero-rated supplies and inverted duty structure.
2 rulings found
Supreme Court
SLP was filed against impugned order of High Court holding that where refund granted to assessee on export of goods was sought to be demanded under Rule 96(10), since Notification No. 20-2024, dated 8-10-2024 was issued during pendency of appeal filed by assessee against such demand, whereby Rule 96(10) was omitted, proceedings of order in original as well as order passed by appellate authority were to be set aside; instant court held issues were squarely covered by Goodluck India Ltd. v. Union of India & Ors. and dismissed SLP
Supreme Court
Omission of Rule 96(10) with effect from 8 October 2024 was held applicable to pending proceedings relating to refund of IGST paid on exported goods and services since no saving clause was introduced and GST Council recommendation for prospective operation was advisory and did not bind rule making authority