High Court of Rajasthan
Baba Contractors and Engineers v. Union of India
D.B. CIVIL WRIT PETITION NO. 21298 OF 2025
The ruling in brief
Where during search and seizure proceedings at business and partners' premises, substantial tax was extracted from petitioner via ITC reversal and cash entries before any show cause notice or voluntary acknowledgment, and contemporaneous records or safeguards for voluntary compliance were absent, such payment was not considered voluntary and retention of amount was unsustainable, necessitating refund of recovered amount.
Where petitioner claimed interest on refund amount alleging unauthorised recovery during search but investigation was still pending, no show cause notice was issued and no adjudication completed, entitlement to interest was premature, so grant of interest was declined pending final determination of liability after investigation, without prejudice to parties' rights on eventual outcome
Provisions considered
Section 74, read with section 54, of Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017/Rajasthan Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 - Rule 142 of Central Goods and Services Tax Rules, 2017/Rajasthan Goods and Services Tax Rules, 2017; Section 56, read with section 54, of Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017/Rajasthan Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017