Supreme Court of India13 July 2026

Fanmade11 Fantasy Sports (P.) Ltd. v. Union of India

For revenue

WRIT PETITION(CIVIL) NO. 153 OF 2026

The ruling in brief

Where writ petition challenging SCN was rendered unnecessary in view of Supreme Court's decision in Gameskraft Technologies, assessee was relegated to appear before Assessing Officer and avail statutory appeal against any adverse assessment order GST : Where final assessment order was passed despite interim protection against coercive action, since statutory remedy of appeal had become available, assessee was relegated to appellate authority with liberty to raise all contentions including revaluation and pre-deposit

Provisions considered

Section 9 of Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 - Article 32 of Constitution of India, 1950

This summary is for general information and is not legal advice. Read the full decision and the applicable law before relying on it.

Related rulings

Chhattisgarh High Court14 Aug 2026

Bhartiya Caterers and Enterprises v. State Bank of India

Where petitioner and respondent No.2 quoted identical rates for meal supply tender and petitioner's bid was rejected amid GST ambiguity, subsequent post-bid offer and allegations of delay or unpaid dues did not establish illegality, arbitrariness, or breach of tender terms, as judicial review under Article 226 is limited to ensuring fairness and process, not to revisiting merits or contract disputes

GSTAT Raipur22 Sept 2026

For assessee

Cent Bank Home Finance Ltd. v. Commissioner, State Tax

Where appellant, a lender of housing loans, faced demand for GST on loan recoveries but invoked exemption under Notification No. 12/2017-CTR Entry 27 for first time before Tribunal, exemption applied as pure legal plea could be raised at any stage and recovery of loan amounts qualified as exempt service under Entry 27 GST: Where a housing loan lender claimed that receipts treated as taxable supply were actually recoveries of principal from written-off housing loan accounts and supported this with bank records showing deposits and SARFAESI charges, failure by revenue to consider admissible certified evidence warranted remand for production and consideration of such documents for just determination of exemption claim

GSTAT Hyderabad18 Sept 2026

For revenue

Boilla Venkataramana Reddy v. Shivenari Canteen Services

Where outsourced caterer supplied food to in-patients within a hospital under contract, and only one supply, namely food, was made to hospital and not as part of composite healthcare supply, GST was leviable on such supply, as composite supply test failed and CBIC Circular supporting exemption applied only to supplies directly by healthcare provider and not outsourced caterer GST: Where caterer did not pay tax on in-patient food supplies based on an incorrect understanding of a Board Circular and no deliberate non-payment was established, invocation of section 74 was unsustainable, and dropping of penalty further negated mala fide intent, thus proceedings were to be treated under section 73 with proper re-determination of tax, interest and penalties GST: Where caterer supplied food to in-patients as per agreement with invoices showing no separate GST tax and department did not allege collection of tax above invoice value, invoice value was to be treated inclusive of tax, requiring application of cum-tax valuation under Rule 35, and tax liability was to be recomputed accordingly, ensuring no excess collection beyond statutory due

CGST S.9

Related rulings

Chhattisgarh High Court14 Aug 2026

CGST S.9

Fanmade11 Fantasy Sports (P.) Ltd. v. Union of India

The ruling in brief

Provisions considered

Fanmade11 Fantasy Sports (P.) Ltd. v. Union of India

The ruling in brief

Provisions considered

Read the full analysis

Read the full analysis

Bhartiya Caterers and Enterprises v. State Bank of India

Cent Bank Home Finance Ltd. v. Commissioner, State Tax

Boilla Venkataramana Reddy v. Shivenari Canteen Services