High Court of Gujarat
Neptune Enterprise v. State of Gujarat
R/SPECIAL CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 12791 OF 2024
The ruling in brief
Where tax authority cancelled registration of assessee-firm retrospectively citing fraud or suppression but failed to consider request for more time to submit key documents, and passed order without deciding on such request or examining supporting evidence, such cancellation violated principles of natural justice and was set aside.
Where petitioners' registration cancellation was followed by revocation proceedings requiring immediate payment via DRC-03 and rejection relied on purchases from dealers whose registration was cancelled suo motu without prior notice to petitioners, imposition of payment and reliance on uncommunicated grounds amounted to jurisdictional overreach, rendering rejection order unsustainable and liable to be quashed.
Where registration was cancelled and revocation was rejected, but appellate authority introduced new grounds beyond original show cause notice, and opportunity to submit documents was denied at cancellation stage, such orders were quashed as non-application of mind and prejudicial amalgamation of issues warranted setting aside of cancellation and appeal with liberty to initiate fresh proceedings with due process
Provisions considered
Section 29 of Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017/Gujarat Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017; Section 30, read with sections 73 and 74, of Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017/Gujarat Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017; Section 107, read with section 29, of Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017/Gujarat Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017
This summary is for general information and is not legal advice. Read the full decision and the applicable law before relying on it.